No Generic Drug Hold Up in Europe Now, India EU Strike Deal
The European Union and India will
miss their target of concluding a free trade agreement by the end of 2010, but
have managed to resolve a spat over EU policies that saw Indian generic drugs
confiscated in European ports while in transit on their way to other developing
countries.
The drug seizures,
which had become an irritant in the broader FTA negotiations, took place in
2008 and 2009, when several shipments of generic drugs from India were held for
weeks by officials at European ports while en route to Brazil. The medicines in
question were not patented in either the source or the destination country, but
were patented in Europe. Brazil and India launched a WTO dispute against the
EU, claiming that the seizures violated multilateral rules governing goods in
transit. Brazil, India, and other developing countries have argued that the EU
is confusing legitimate generics with counterfeits, and that the drug seizures
could undermine poor countries’ ability to acquire cheaper medicines.
Following an
EU-India summit in Brussels on 10 December, officials said that the two sides
had resolved the dispute in a manner that would allow Indian generics to
transit through European ports without fear of confiscation.
EU officials say
that India has not yet formally withdrawn its complaint at the WTO.
As for the FTA,
Brussels and New Delhi are now aiming to conclude the deal by the spring of
2011. Rahul Khullar,
India’s commerce secretary, said that both sides have
planned an intensified work schedule in the months to come, with lead
negotiators meeting at least monthly, and ministers to meet in March.
Khullar said that some
chapters of the agreement were complete, such as competition, trade
facilitation, and dispute settlement. Others needed more work: on goods trade,
both sides are preparing revised offers of market access. Services, trade defence instruments, and rules of origin need to be finalised.
Also incomplete are
controversial chapters on investment and intellectual property rights. Separate
from the dispute over the treatment of generic drugs in transit, public health
advocates fear that the prospective EU-India FTA may include intellectual
property provisions that will threaten access to medicine for the millions of
people in developing countries who rely on low-cost Indian generics to treat
conditions such as HIV/AIDS. They say that leaked copies of the draft suggest
that the EU is seeking rules on “test data exclusivity” that would require
would-be generics manufacturers to run their own expensive, and potentially
risky clinical trials, instead of using the data produced by the company that
first made the drug. Critics also worry that the EU is seeking to extend the
patent protection period for drugs beyond the 20 years provided for under WTO
rules. Reduced competition from Indian generics could increase drug costs
across the developing world. AIDS patients and advocates organised
protests to coincide with the EU-India meet in Brussels, calling for the trade
negotiations to safeguard access to medicine.