High-level Panel Discusses how International Trading System can Spur
Inclusive Development
Developing countries
need to implement strategic domestic policies and keep trade open to promote
decent work and development, panellists say
UNCTAD XIII Doha, Qatar Press
Release dated 26 April 2012
Developing countries must set up national
strategies and build industrial capacities to better integrate their economies
into high-value-added activities in the value chain, thus bolstering trade,
creating jobs, and reaping better income opportunities, eminent policymakers
and experts said Tuesday at a panel discussion titled “Reflections on the
international trading system and inclusive development.”
The debate, held on the fourth day of the UNCTAD
XIII quadrennial conference here, featured the Secretary-General of UNCTAD, the
Director-General of the World Trade Organization (WTO), trade ministers,
ambassadors to the WTO, officials of several other international agencies, and
representatives of the private sector. The panel discussion was moderated by Ransford Smith, Deputy Secretary-General of the
Commonwealth Secretariat.
Trade is a necessary but not sufficient condition
for achieving inclusive and sustainable development, these speakers emphasized.
How, what, and in which sequence countries liberalize their economies, and what
policies they implement, matters a great deal in how effectively and broadly
the benefits of trade are spread through national populations, they said.
“The multilateral trading system is a precious
global public good for all and should be strengthened,” UNCTAD
Secretary-General Supachai told the gathering. The
international trading system is becoming multi-polar with new players emerging
onto the scene and more trade opportunities shifting to the South. The
multilateral trade architecture plays a central role, he said. Currently, he
told the meeting, there is tension between globalization and national
development agendas. He called for finding ways to make the two coherent and
complementary.
WTO Director-General Pascal Lamy
said “The multilateral trading system is in no need of reform.” He said that
although trade structure has changed, the issues debated in the WTO have not
changed. Instead, the relative importance of issues has changed, and each faces
domestic political constraints. The problem is with the domestic constituencies
resisting further trade liberalization, fearing competition, he said.
A principal difficulty with harnessing trade for
development gains is that developing countries are mostly producing raw
materials and consuming finished goods, panellists at the meeting said. The
fundamental problem is how to shift these economies into producing
higher-value-added products and how to create much-needed employment. This is
not simple and requires strategic policies that support industrial development,
South African Trade Minister Rob Davies said. For African countries, enhanced
regional integration will help contribute to their trade, domestic capacity
building and economic growth, he said.
Various panellists said developing countries need a
balanced and equitable outcome from the Doha Round of trade negotiations. They
said it is important that the outcome give high priority to development
concerns, such as by improving market access and eliminating trade distortions
that affect developing countries. Some developing country products have
comparative advantages, they pointed out, but still
face high tariffs in some developed countries.
Jayant Dasgupta, Ambassador of India to the WTO, said trade
liberalization should serve as a “development tool” and should not be seen as
an end in itself. Trade liberalization creates winners and losers in the short
run, and the magnitude of adjustment can be unsustainable for developing
countries with weak domestic capacities. Sound regulatory frameworks and
institutions, complementary policies, and social safety nets are needed for
sustainability and inclusiveness, he told the meeting.
Zhang Xiangchen,
Director-General of the Policy Research Department of the Ministry of Commerce
of China, said China would like to play a constructive role in the multilateral
trading system, but not a leading role, as it remains a developing country.
Speakers said UNCTAD should continue in its role as
a forum and platform for consensus-building on new and emerging issues in
international trade and on the trading system, so that these matters can later
be taken up for rule-making in other fora, including
WTO. In this sense, they viewed UNCTAD’s role as one of achieving coherence in
global economic policy making. They urged that UNCTAD’s work be invigorated to
better contribute to forging multilateral consensus on issues of particular
importance to inclusive and sustainable development.