Filing of Appeal in the Wrong Forum in Matters Relating to Valuation
of Determination of Rate of Duty
[CBEC Instruction F.No.390/Misc./100/2010-JC
dated 22nd September 2011]
Reference is invited to Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act,1944, made applicable to
Service Tax vide Section 83 0f the Finance Act,1994 and Section 130E(b) of the
Customs Act, 1962 which stipulates that appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court
against a Tribunal order in a case involving determination of any question
having a relation to the rate of duty or value of the goods for the purpose of
assessment. Your attention is also invited to Circular No 935/25/2010-CX dated
21.09.2010 regarding Measures to streamline the processing of departmental
litigation before the Courts and Tribunals.
2. Annexure
I of the said Circular deals with provisions for filing of (a) Civil
appeals/SLP against the High Court order before the Supreme Court and (b) Civil
Appeal against any Tribunal order. It was mentioned therein that Civil Appeal
against the Tribunal order is required to be filed in the Supreme Court in
cases relating, among other things, to the determination of any question having
a relation to the rate of duty or the value of goods for the purposes of
assessment as statutorily prescribed.
3. It
has come to the notice of the Board that field formations have filed appeals in
the jurisdictional High Courts in matters relating either to determination of
rate of duty or value of the goods which ought to have been filed in the
Supreme Court. Such appeals get dismissed by the High Courts
on the ground of jurisdiction alone, invariably after pending for a long time.
Civil Appeals filed in the Supreme Court in such cases have frequently been
dismissed on the ground of limitation. It may also be noted that the time
period for filing Civil Appeal is 60 days from the date of receipt of the
Tribunal order in the Commissionerate.
4. The
Commissioners are, therefore, directed to examine the issue involved in the
dispute very carefully for deciding the appellate forum. The jurisdictional
Chief Commissioners, while giving concurrence to the proposal for filing
appeal, are expected to ensure that appeal is being filed in the correct forum
in order to avoid needless litigation being pursued in the wrong forum and
consequent loss of revenue.
5. The
above may be brought to the notice of the field formations under your charge
for scrupulous compliance.