WTO DG Pascal Lamy on World Trade in Food
Excerpts from Speech to Agro Economist
at Zurich on 30 August 2011
“In my opinion, the world still has a
long way to go in designing a coherent international agricultural trade policy
framework.”
“At the end of the day, trade is no
more than a simple transmission belt between supply and demand. It allows
food-surplus countries to complement the countries in food-deficit. “
“All agricultural policy-makers would
want agricultural systems that deliver sufficient food, feed and fibre.
“Global integration allows us to think
of efficiency beyond national boundaries. It allows us to score efficiency
gains on a global scale by shifting agricultural production to where it can
best take place. It can also allow for a more efficient sourcing of the inputs
to agricultural production.”
“National boundaries were defined by
none other than a long historical game of musical chairs. While some sit on
fertile lands, blessed with sunshine and freshwater, others are condemned to
arid and inhospitable terrains. Trade imposed itself because of differences
across countries, in these natural endowments or in the productivity of labour.”
“If a country such as Egypt were to aim
for self-sufficiency in agriculture, it would soon need more than one River
Nile. International trade in food is water-saving.”
“International trade is not the source
of the food crises. If anything, international trade has reduced the price of
food over the years through greater competition.”
“International trade in agriculture is
less than 10% of world trade. While 50% of the world's production of industrial
goods enters international trade, it is important that you know that only 25%
of the world's agricultural production is traded globally. Rice, production in
world trade is only 5-7%, making for a particularly thin international rice
market, of the world's 25% of food production that enters international trade,
the vast majority (two-thirds) is processed food, and not rice, wheat, or soya.”
“The 2008 food crisis is termed as, the
“rice price crisis.” It is because of how little international trade there is
in rice, that rice prices reacted so dramatically to export restrictions. The
limited international trade in rice made rice prices more, and not less,
volatile. Deeper international commodity markets are less prone to crises.”
“I shall never forget a meeting with
Yemen's Minister of Trade a few years back in which he complained of the
“starve-thy-neighbour” policies that followed from the food crisis of 2008, as
Yemen was being starved of its staple rice supply in the wake of numerous
export restrictions by others. Saudi Arabia went through in growing its own
wheat, and which it has called-off just this year because of its heavy toll on
water.”
“The key mandate guiding agriculture
negotiators is to achieve substantial improvements in the area of market access
(i.e. tariff reduction), substantial reductions in trade-distorting subsidies,
and the eventual elimination of all forms of export subsidies; something which
had occurred in manufacturing over 50 years ago.”
“Export subsidies which are completely
prohibited for industrial goods, are yet to be
phased-out through the Doha Round in the area of agriculture!”
“Many trade-distorting agricultural
subsidies have found shelter in Amber and Blue Boxes, and a Peace Clause.
Whereas the world's trade-weighted average industrial goods tariff is about 8%,
in agriculture it is 25%. Not to mention tariff peaks, which in agriculture
still rise up to 1000%!”
“Export restrictions have a domino,
market-closing, effect, with one restriction bringing about another, as the
world started to anticipate a global food shortage.”
“Phenomenon of the purchase of
agricultural land abroad — dubbed “land grabs” by some, overcoming the problem
of export restrictions by buying land abroad and cultivating it for the
importing country's use.”