Chair’s Summary – 04 September 2009
Following is the full text of Shri Anand Sharma,
Union Minister of Commerce and Industry’s concluding chair’s summary at the
Ministerial Meeting on Re-energising Doha – A Commitment to Development, here
today.
“Excellencies, Director General Mr. Lamy, Senior
Officials, Ambassadors, and distinguished delegates,
We have now reached the end of two days of
intensive engagement. Let me first thank you all for your statements and
interventions over the course of the last day or so. I am happy that we were
able to cover so much ground in such a short span of time. I trust you will all
agree that we have made good progress over the last two days and we now have a
fair idea of the way forward.
The Delhi Ministerial meeting was conceived and
designed as a representative forum of the WTO membership, bringing together
groups from across the spectrum of interests and positions in the Doha
negotiations, in a microcosm of the WTO itself, in a bid to give a determined
push to the multilateral process.
The objective was to develop a broad-based
consensus to remove the impediments coming in the way of multilateral
discussions and to provide clear directions to negotiators to re-energise the
multilateral process at the WTO.
I will now summarise the proceedings of 3rd and 4th
September.
Ministers recalled the outcomes of meetings held
earlier during the year at London (G20), Bali (Cairns Group), Paris (Trade
Ministers), L’Aquila (G8 plus) and Singapore (APEC Trade Ministers). It was
further recalled that leaders had set a timeline of 2010 for the conclusion of
the Doha Round.
Ministers acknowledged that the unambiguous
political signals emanating from earlier meetings had not been translated into
action in Geneva. They were conscious that mere reaffirmation of commitment was
not enough unless this was converted into effective instructions to negotiators
to re-engage, with a view to concluding the Round successfully within 2010.
Ministers were also sensitive to the deleterious
impact of the prolonged global economic crisis, which has put to the test the
commitment of member countries to free, fair and equitable rule-based
international trade. They were unanimous in expressing the view that
strengthening the multilateral trading system by concluding the Doha Round at
the earliest, was vital.
The Director General, WTO provided an overall
perspective of the way forward. The Chairs of the Agriculture, NAMA and
Services Negotiating Groups outlined their work plans in their respective
areas.
The G-20 and the G-33 emphasised the need to
respect the multilateral mandate as reflected in the work done on the
Agriculture and NAMA modalities over the last seven years; both Groups were of
the view that the texts of December 2008 must form the basis of future work.
Regarding the negotiating process, they reiterated that bilateral and
plurilateral meetings could only be used to supplement the multilateral process
and not to substitute it. The G-20 called for the expeditious completion of the
Round with contributions from all Members.
The Cotton-4 recalled the mandate of the Hong Kong
Ministerial Declaration according to which the cotton issue must be addressed
ambitiously, expeditiously and specifically. They expressed the hope that this
issue would be taken up on priority when talks resumed. They were supported in
this by all other Groups, particularly, the G-33, the G-20, the African Group
and the ACP Group.
The African Group re-emphasized the importance of
keeping development concerns as the main focus of negotiations. ACP Group
reaffirmed the need for the banana issue to be specifically addressed outside
of the modalities on agriculture, in order to reach a just and balanced
outcome.
The two groups, supported by CARICOM, also drew the
attention of participants to the progress made in July 2008 on preference
erosion modalities. They expressed disappointment that the specific understandings
developed then had not reached fruition on account of the delay in resumption;
they emphasised the importance of this issue for their economies.
The G-10 group expressed its commitment to a
successful and expeditious conclusion of the Doha Round to face the economic
downturn and to fight the spread of protectionism. Citing the contributions
being made by developed countries, the Group stressed the need for a balanced
result in the single undertaking.
The LDC Group expressed concern that delay in
concluding the Doha Round was costing them dearly. They called for an
expeditious conclusion of the Round and progress on issues that were critical to
them including DFQF.
Statements were made by coordinators of the groups
on behalf of their groups and some of the Member countries in their individual
capacities.
Let me turn now to what I believe are the
understandings reached on a number of process-related issues that would
determine the way ahead. These are summarized below:
There was a unanimous affirmation on the need to
conclude the Doha Round within 2010. There was a clear recognition that
differences subsist on issues and intensifying negotiations was the first step
towards bridging these gaps.
There was a strong re-affirmation that development
remains at the heart of the Doha Round.
Ministers also called upon Chief Negotiators/Senior
Officials to meet in Geneva beginning 14 September 2009 to draw up a process of
engagement for the next 2-3 months; and, to work with the Chairs of the
Negotiating Groups to prepare an overall agenda of action.
Ministers agreed that Chairs of the Negotiating
Groups on Agriculture and NAMA would be requested to draw up issue-based work
plans in consultation with Chief Negotiators/ Senior Officials, for
intensifying engagement to complete negotiations.
Ministers agreed that in consultation with Chief
Negotiators/Senior Officials, Chairs of other Negotiating Groups would also
draw up work plans, including, where applicable, tabling, discussion and
finalization of texts where required and the timelines for submission of
revised offers (Services), in line with the overall agenda of action.
Ministers agreed that negotiations should resume on
the basis of progress achieved till December 2008.
Ministers agreed that work agenda for LDCs covering
all specific issues across the entire spectrum should be put on a faster track
for negotiating convergence with the DG Lamy and Chairs of Negotiating Groups
taking the lead in this process.
Ministers were of the view that the multilateral
process should continue to be the main process of negotiations for the strength
of its inclusiveness and transparency. Other forms of engagements can work as
an adjunct for developing a better understanding among members.
Ministers agreed to review progress and provide
further guidance on how to complete negotiations within the expected 2010
timeline. All opportunities for political guidance, including at the level of
leaders to be used between now and the end of November 2009 as also to
iteratively track progress.
Mindful of the fact that the Doha Round has been in
progress for eight years, it was agreed that all efforts must be made to bring
the Round to an ambitious and development oriented conclusion within 2010 as
resolved by world leaders.
This brings me to the end of my summary of
proceedings.
I thank you all once again for your enthusiastic
support and participation. I am glad that you have made the effort and taken
the time to participate in this Ministerial meeting. I am sure that our efforts
will bear fruit and we will see a constructive resumption of Doha Round talks
very soon.